USC / Stanford — Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform
Study details from the Studies index, with sources and citations for each field.
Notes · Probability (USC Understanding America Study); Weighted sample; ages 13–17. The supplement describes 509 eligible respondents, while its unweighted tables use 505; this discrepancy is unresolved. Platform-specific weighted bases vary.
References
Lee et al. (2026) — Instrument— Questionnaire (standalone copy of OSF v2 appendix)
Lee, A. Y., et al. (2026). Survey items appendix to Measurement of American adolescents’ experiences of online harms: A nationally representative survey. PsyArXiv, version 2 (August 11, 2026).
instrument- Publication page:
- https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/hksru_v2
- Retrieved on:
- 2026-05-22
- Pages:
- 21
- Archived source:
- Download PDF
- File verification
File verification details
SHA-256:
a85a84138ca563702e8187972614fb4c81039eda1a3435e6a01ea977bbdab21c
Lee et al. (2026) — JAMA Pediatrics— JAMA Pediatrics article
Lee, A. Y., Lim, C. H. J., Liu, S. X., et al. (2026). Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform. JAMA Pediatrics. Published online September 18, 2026. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.4692.
report- Publication page:
- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2854310
- Retrieved on:
- 2026-09-19
- Pages:
- 10
- Archived source:
- Download PDF
- File verification
File verification details
SHA-256:
2243efa940983636178c05d4dd3e843dfb04cc3dd95273e72a7a73821f5f3528
Lee et al. (2026) — Supplement 1— JAMA Pediatrics Supplement 1additional source
Lee, A. Y., Lim, C. H. J., Liu, S. X., et al. (2026). Supplemental Online Content for Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform. JAMA Pediatrics. Published online September 18, 2026. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.4692.
methodology- Publication page:
- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2854310
- Retrieved on:
- 2026-09-19
- Pages:
- 16
- Archived source:
- Download PDF
- File verification
File verification details
SHA-256:
61de44f133842bd96617fe0c638d944cb9eea8ea49fcfca1edfede94508e85e1
Lee et al. (2026) — Additional weighted crosstabs— Weighted unsuppressed Table 2 dataadditional source
Weighted, unsuppressed Table 2 crosstabs for Lee et al. (2026), Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform. Supplied separately on September 21, 2026; approved for publication but not included unsuppressed in the manuscript.
crosstabs- Publication page:
- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2854310
- Retrieved on:
- 2026-09-21
- Archived source:
- Download XLSX
- File verification
File verification details
SHA-256:
2829bc5718d66c98505c224aa779d19e733147c173147685c4ee542068965a1e
Study details & methodology
| Name | “Adolescents’ Experiences of Online Harms by Platform” Lee, Lim, Liu, et al., JAMA Pediatrics; USC and Stanford study. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.4692. |
| Country | “US adolescents aged 13 to 17 years” |
| Publication year | “Published online September 18, 2026.” Publication year 2026; fieldwork February–December 2025. |
| Fieldwork dates | “conducted from February to December 2025” |
| Sample size | “The weighted sample included 472 adolescents” Weighted N=472. Supplement 1 describes 509 eligible respondents (pp.2–3), while its unweighted tables show 505 (p.6); the sources do not reconcile these counts. Platform-specific weighted user bases vary. |
| Age range | “US adolescents aged 13 to 17 years” |
| Sampling | “through the probability-based Understanding America Study panel” Probability-based recruitment via the USC Understanding America Study (UAS) panel; weighted to be nationally representative of US adolescents aged 13-17. |
Harms measured
| Bullying | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, has anyone done any of these things to you?…” “Insulted or disrespected you”“Contacted you in an inappropriate way”“Damaged your reputation”“Threatened you”“Excluded you or left you out” Q028 — direct harassment victimization (one combined Yes/No item). Follow-ups ask whether the respondent felt threatened and whether it was repeated; Q030 is the separate witnessing version. |
| Self-Harm | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, have you seen someone harm themselves, or threaten to do so?” Q036 — exposure to self-harm (Yes/No). Q037 is a companion: 'have you seen anyone encourage someone to harm themselves?'. |
| Violence | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, have you seen any violent, bloody, or disturbing images that”“bothered you?” Q035 measures exposure to violent, bloody, or disturbing images that bothered the respondent, using Yes/No responses. |
| Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, has anyone used your photos in an inappropriate way?…” “Was the inappropriate use of your photos sexually explicit or involve nudity?” Q034A is asked after Yes to the broad photo-misuse screen Q034. The context follow-up also refers to broad photo misuse; its generic Yes routing does not specify Q034 versus Q034A. Published photo-misuse results do not isolate sexually explicit or nude imagery. |
| Problematic Use | “How often do you feel that your use of technology gets in the way of your sleep?” Q047 asks about sleep interference using Never/Rarely/Sometimes/Often. Q048 asks which services contribute, only when Q047 is Sometimes or Often. Q047 itself does not specify a recall window. |
| Contact | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, have you received unwanted sexual advances?” Q031 asks about unwanted sexual advances; Q032 separately asks about an unwanted conversation. Both use Yes/No responses. Q026 concerns seeing unwanted sexual images, a related exposure measure that does not necessarily establish direct contact. |
Offline or broader-context measurement
| Bullying | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, has anyone done any of these things to you?…” “Insulted or disrespected you” Q028 uses an online/in-person stem and includes 'In-person / offline' in its context follow-up. This documents offline measurement independently of published-result availability. |
| Self-Harm | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, have you seen someone harm themselves, or threaten to do so?” Q036 uses an online/in-person stem and its context follow-up includes 'In-person / offline', documenting offline measurement. Q037 separately asks about encouragement of self-harm. |
| Violence | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, have you seen any violent, bloody, or disturbing images” Q035 uses an online/in-person stem and its context follow-up includes 'In-person / offline', documenting offline measurement. |
| Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, has anyone used your photos in an inappropriate way?…” “Was the inappropriate use of your photos sexually explicit or involve nudity?”Response options: In-person / offline The Q034/Q034A context list includes In-person / offline. Its generic Yes routing does not specify whether it follows broad photo misuse or the sexually explicit/nudity follow-up. |
| Contact | “In the past 4 weeks, whether online or in person, have you received unwanted sexual advances?” Same Q031 online/offline unified stem; follow-up includes 'In-person / offline'. |
Platforms measured
| Platform list | “In which contexts/online services did you experience something that affected you negatively?” The harm-specific context rosters include 16 named apps. Email, Text Messaging, Online Gaming, Any dating App, catch-all choices, an unlabeled choice, and offline contexts are excluded from the app count. Table 2 publishes results for 8 of the named apps; unavailable or suppressed results do not remove documented measurement coverage. |
| Published app coverage | “Among adolescents who used each platform in the past 4 wk” The published app-level columns on PDF pp.5–6 cover 8 named apps: Snapchat, YouTube, TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, Pinterest, Discord, and FaceTime. Online gaming, Text messaging, and Email are categories or channels rather than named apps. Additional weighted crosstabs are supplied separately; no offline sleep question was asked. |
Per-app measurement by harm
| Bullying | “In which contexts/online services did you experience being a target of harassment” Q028 asks about direct harassment and is followed by a multiple-select context list with 16 named apps. Generic channels, activities and catch-all options are excluded from the app count. |
| Self-Harm | “In which contexts/online services have you seen someone harm themselves, or threaten to do so?” Q036 follow-up and Q037's encouragement-of-self-harm follow-up cover the 16 branded apps in the context roster. Published numerical-result availability is recorded separately. |
| Violence | “In which contexts/online services have you seen any violent, bloody, or disturbing images that bothered you?” Q035 follow-up covers the 16 branded apps in the context roster. Published numerical-result availability is recorded separately. |
| Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) | “Was the inappropriate use of your photos sexually explicit or involve nudity?”“In which contexts/online services has anyone used your photos in an inappropriate way?” Q034A identifies sexually explicit or nude photo misuse. The 16-app context follow-up refers to broad photo misuse, and its generic Yes routing does not explicitly identify Q034 versus Q034A. This does not establish an NCII-specific app estimate. |
| Problematic Use | “Which of the below online services get in the way of your sleep?” Q048 — asked only when Q047 = Sometimes/Often; covers the 16 branded apps in the service roster. Generic channels, activities, and catch-all options are excluded. No separate offline sleep measure is asked. |
| Contact | “In which contexts/online services have you received unwanted sexual advances?” Q031 and Q032 have harm-specific context follow-ups, each with 16 named apps plus generic online and offline contexts. |