Thorn Sextortion
Study details from the Studies index, with sources and citations for each field.
Notes · Non-probability; Ages 13-20 (64% teens 13-17 / 36% young adults 18-20), reporting on experiences under age 18; app-specific delivery follow-up n=267.
References
Thorn (2025) Sexual Extortion— Report
Thorn (2025). Sexual Extortion & Young People: Navigating Threats in Digital Environments. June 2025.
report- Retrieved from:
- https://info.thorn.org/hubfs/Research/Thorn_SexualExtortionandYoungPeople_June2025.pdf
- Publication page:
- https://www.thorn.org/research/library/sexual-extortion-young-people/
- Retrieved on:
- 2026-05-21
- Pages:
- 40
- Archived source:
- Download PDF
- File verification
File verification details
SHA-256:
1bdddcd34079e3f10824b890924027fece8f224ba1b675a586c8dee54e8d642d
Study details & methodology
| Name | “Sexual Extortion & Young People” Full subtitle on cover: 'Navigating Threats in Digital Environments'. |
| Country | “In total, 1,200 young people from across the United States participated in an 18-minute online survey from September 27, 2024, to October 7, 2024.” |
| Publication year | |
| Fieldwork dates | “an 18-minute online survey from September 27, 2024, to October 7, 2024.” September 27 – October 7, 2024. |
| Sample size | “In total, 1,200 young people from across the United States participated in an 18-minute online survey from September 27, 2024, to October 7, 2024.” Full survey n=1,200. The app-specific threat-delivery follow-up has n=267 (Figure 22, p.31). |
| Age range | “The term “teens” specifies respondents aged 13-17, while “young adults”” Ages 13–20; the report describes the sample as 64% teens aged 13–17 and 36% young adults aged 18–20. Older respondents report experiences before age 18. |
| Sampling | “To ensure a nationwide representative sample was obtained, data was weighted by age, gender, race, and geography based on U.S. Census data.” Non-probability online recruitment; minors recruited via caregivers (consent required), 18–20 self-consenting. Weighted to U.S. Census benchmarks. |
Harms measured
| Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) | “QB1. [IF 18-20: While you were under the age of 18, had; IF 13-17: Has] anyone ever threatened to share a sexual image of you with another person or post it online in order to make you do something? By sexual image, we mean a picture or video (real or fake) that shows you nude or mostly nude.…” “threatened to share a sexual image of you with another person or post it online in order to make you do something”Response options: Yes / Prefer not to say / No QB1 asks about threats to share real or fake sexual imagery of the respondent to make them do something. Respondents aged 18–20 are asked only about experiences before age 18. |
Platforms measured
| Platform list | “Platforms and apps sextortionists used to communicate threats to victims” QS18b-e (Figure 22, p.31) identifies 33 named apps used to communicate sextortion threats, among 267 respondents reporting a technology-mediated experience before age 18. The “Other” category is excluded. This measures the channel of threat delivery, not prevalence among each app’s users. |
Per-app measurement by harm
| Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII) | “QS18b-e. You indicated this person made threats to you using private messaging apps/social media platforms/gaming apps/dating or hookup apps. Which of these did the person use to send you the threats?…” “Platforms and apps sextortionists used to communicate threats to victims” QS18b-e follows the technology categories in QS18a (Figure 21, p.30), with n=267. It identifies the threat-delivery channel, which may differ from where imagery was obtained or shared. The report does not give app-user denominators. |