← All studies

Thorn Sextortion

Study details from the Studies index, with sources and citations for each field.

Geo
US
Year
2025
N
1,200
Ages
13-20
Per-app coverage
Harms
Offline—
Files

Notes · Non-probability; Ages 13-20 (64% teens 13-17 / 36% young adults 18-20), reporting on experiences under age 18; app-specific delivery follow-up n=267.

References

  1. Thorn (2025) Sexual Extortion— Report

    Thorn (2025). Sexual Extortion & Young People: Navigating Threats in Digital Environments. June 2025.

    report
    Retrieved on:
    2026-05-21
    Pages:
    40
    Archived source:
    Download PDF
    File verification
    File verification details

    SHA-256: 1bdddcd34079e3f10824b890924027fece8f224ba1b675a586c8dee54e8d642d

Study details & methodology

Name
“Sexual Extortion & Young People”

Full subtitle on cover: 'Navigating Threats in Digital Environments'.

Country
“In total, 1,200 young people from across the United States participated in an 18-minute online survey from September 27, 2024, to October 7, 2024.”
Publication year
“JUNE 2025”

Published June 2025.

Fieldwork dates
“an 18-minute online survey from September 27, 2024, to October 7, 2024.”

September 27 – October 7, 2024.

Sample size
“In total, 1,200 young people from across the United States participated in an 18-minute online survey from September 27, 2024, to October 7, 2024.”

Full survey n=1,200. The app-specific threat-delivery follow-up has n=267 (Figure 22, p.31).

Age range
“The term “teens” specifies respondents aged 13-17, while “young adults””

Ages 13–20; the report describes the sample as 64% teens aged 13–17 and 36% young adults aged 18–20. Older respondents report experiences before age 18.

Sampling
“To ensure a nationwide representative sample was obtained, data was weighted by age, gender, race, and geography based on U.S. Census data.”

Non-probability online recruitment; minors recruited via caregivers (consent required), 18–20 self-consenting. Weighted to U.S. Census benchmarks.

Harms measured

Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII)
“QB1. [IF 18-20: While you were under the age of 18, had; IF 13-17: Has] anyone ever threatened to share a sexual image of you with another person or post it online in order to make you do something? By sexual image, we mean a picture or video (real or fake) that shows you nude or mostly nude.…” “threatened to share a sexual image of you with another person or post it online in order to make you do something”Response options: Yes / Prefer not to say / No

QB1 asks about threats to share real or fake sexual imagery of the respondent to make them do something. Respondents aged 18–20 are asked only about experiences before age 18.

Platforms measured

Platform list
“Platforms and apps sextortionists used to communicate threats to victims”

QS18b-e (Figure 22, p.31) identifies 33 named apps used to communicate sextortion threats, among 267 respondents reporting a technology-mediated experience before age 18. The “Other” category is excluded. This measures the channel of threat delivery, not prevalence among each app’s users.

Per-app measurement by harm

Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (NCII)
“QS18b-e. You indicated this person made threats to you using private messaging apps/social media platforms/gaming apps/dating or hookup apps. Which of these did the person use to send you the threats?…” “Platforms and apps sextortionists used to communicate threats to victims”

QS18b-e follows the technology categories in QS18a (Figure 21, p.30), with n=267. It identifies the threat-delivery channel, which may differ from where imagery was obtained or shared. The report does not give app-user denominators.